Tree Campus

Mississippi State University is now a Tree Campus USA as designated by the National Arbor Day Foundation. For the state’s Land Grant University, this is a special recognition. To be a tree campus, a university must meet five standards:

Standard 1 – Campus Tree Advisory Committee

Standard 2 – Campus Tree Care Plan

Standard 3 – Campus Tree Program with Dedicated Annual Expenditures

Standard 4 – Arbor Day Observance

Standard 5 – Service Learning Project (MSU’s service learning project is a campus tree inventory)

MSU was recognized as a Tree Campus at the Mississippi Urban Forest Council annual meeting in October, 2014. We will have an official celebration with students and university officials on February 13, 2016, which is Arbor Day for the state of Mississippi.

Name This Tree

This tree is widely planted in U.S. cities due to its hardiness and fall foliage, but is native to China. It can reach a height of over 50 ft. and is a living fossil with some specimens more than 2,500 years old. It is extremely resistant to disease and insects. This tree is dioecious and fertilization occurs similar to ferns, mosses, and algae. The tree has been used for medicinal purposes, particularly as a dietary supplement to enhance cognitive functions, to treat Alzheimer’s disease, and to treat high blood pressure. What is this tree?

Why Urban and Community Forestry in Mississippi?

Forestry by all definitions – as a science, an industry, an ecological resource, a cultural artifact – is inherently linked to human communities. It is important that forestry be addressed as it pertains to communities in addition to individual landowners because individual decisions impact, as Pinchot noted, the Greater Good. In turn, community agency is critical to the sustainable, long-term management of our forest resources. Community agency is the act of multiple, diverse interests in a given place coming together towards the goal of addressing common needs. An entire community rallying behind the preservation of a park is an example of community agency. Residents joining forces to help disaster victims is another example.

Addressing natural resource issues from a community agency perspective is very important in an increasingly urbanizing world. Dr. David Nowak has noted that urban land use expanded 3.6% (67.8 million acres) between 1990 and 2010. This growth is expected to increase by over 2 million acres per year, or 8.7%, during the next 45 years, greater than the size of Montana. Most of Mississippi’s urban growth is taking place south of Memphis, northeast of Jackson, and along the Gulf Coast.

Despite this trend, Nowak states the percent of urban tree cover is actually greater than the percent rural tree cover in the United States. Nationally, there are 23.7 million acres of urban tree cover constituting 35% tree cover versus 34.1% rural tree cover, a difference of 2.37 million acres.

Difference - Urban vs. Rural Tree Cover
Difference – Urban vs. Rural Tree Cover

It is important to keep in mind that on average, about 20% of the projected forestland subsumed by urbanization will remain as forest within the urban boundary, although it will be parcelized and fragmented. This forest must be managed even if it is not managed for timber production.

Rural forest subsumed
Rural forest subsumed

Urban tree canopy is critical to community well-being. Nowak has estimated there are around 4.9 billion trees, or 15 trees per U.S. resident. Together, these trees provide approximately $4.1 trillion dollars in structural value ($12,900 per person). The national urban tree canopy stores and sequesters $52.5 billion of carbon per year (7.4 million tons in Mississippi). In addition, U.S. urban forests have important health benefits, removing an estimated $4.7 billion of contaminants from the air each year. Finally, in an age of energy consumption consciousness, Nowak noted urban forests help avoid $7.2 billion per year in energy usage.

Dr. Nowak’s statistics make a compelling case for urban and community forest management. Urban and peri-urban places will continue to grow – even in Mississippi. Not only does urban growth have implications for urban forests, it has serious implications for rural forests as well.


Around 100 years ago when people like Gifford Pinchot, John Muir, and Aldo Leopold argued that society needed to start thinking about preserving and utilizing rural forests sustainably using scientific management. It’s time for a similar sea change in thinking about urban forests. We have to stop ignoring our urban natural resources and start giving them the credit they deserve if we are to continue to enjoy their benefits.